After the book was already printed, a senior DIA official claimed the reviewer had missed several dozen paragraphs containing "Top Secret" information. The government demanded the publisher stop distribution. When the publisher refused (the book was already on shelves), the Department of Defense did something almost unheard of in a democracy:
The redacted sections identified a specific senior al-Qaeda operative (codenamed "Headquarters") who was hiding in a cave complex near the Pakistan border. The unredacted text allegedly included the exact grid coordinates. The Pentagon argued this would "tip off" the enemy. Critics argued the enemy already knew where they lived. operation dark heart unredacted
But the physical first edition? The one that didn't get pulped? That is a piece of history. It represents the tension between a soldier’s right to tell his story and a government’s duty to protect secrets. In the case of Operation Dark Heart , the redactions may have actually done the opposite of their intent: They didn't hide the story. They made sure everyone wanted to read it. After the book was already printed, a senior
But what was actually in those blacked-out pages? And why did the Department of Defense go to unprecedented lengths to buy back and destroy copies of a book that had already been cleared for publication? First, let’s set the stage. LTC Anthony Shaffer was a intelligence officer working for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). His memoir details his time running a covert program known as "Able Danger" (a pre-9/11 data-mining operation) and his 2003 mission in Afghanistan to hunt down high-value targets. The unredacted text allegedly included the exact grid
Then, the Pentagon panicked.